Search Results for "Lokayukta investigation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Lokayukta investigation"

163 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Proceedings and Contradictory Witness Testimony. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 8 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2 May 2025

The appellant, Sri. Manjanna M.K., a Head Constable at Bagalagunte Police Station, was convicted by the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Interplay Between Section 17A and Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 156(3) CrPC in Context of Prior Approval for Investigation Against Public Servants. The court framed questions of law regarding the necessity of prior approval under Section 17A PC Act even after a Magistrate's order under Section 156(3) CrPC, and the stage at which sanction under Section 19 PC Act is required in private complaints.

21 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court was hearing a petition arising from a complaint filed against a former Chief Minister of Karnataka alleging corruption under the Pre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition and Discharges Accused in Corruption Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Abetment. Petitioner, a friend of the main accused, was charged under Sections 13(1)(d), 13(1)(e) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 109 IPC for allegedly helping to legalize illegal money by paying Rs.25 lakhs for the daughter's medical course; court found no material to show abetment or conspiracy.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Dr. Mohankumar M., was arraigned as accused No.4 in Spl.C.C.No.656/2021 before the XXIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Speci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Quashing of FIR in Corruption Case — High Court's Premature Appreciation of Evidence Set Aside. The Court held that quashing an FIR under Section 482 CrPC based on lack of direct evidence and departmental exoneration, without considering investigation material, is legally unsustainable.

23 Apr 2024

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Karnataka High Court quashing an FIR registered under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension Order of Executive Engineer in KRIDL Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Reasons. Suspension order set aside as it was passed mechanically without considering the employee's explanation and without recording reasons as required under Rule 3(2) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966.

8 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Sri. Zaranappa Chincholikar, an Executive Engineer with Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL), challenged an orde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Company Chairman in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent and Compliance with Tax Demand. Criminal Liability Under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Not Made Out as Differential Road Tax Was Paid Upon Demand Under Section 8A of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957, Rendering Proceedings Abuse of Process.

14 Mar 2022

The appeal arose from an order of the Dharwad Bench of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanctioning Authority's Admission of Using Draft Sanction Without Independent Application of Mind Renders Prosecution Void Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Mar 2021

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Ramesh Khandu Salve, a BMC Inspector, charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

22 Jan 2020

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Gopal Ambadas Gawali, a Police Head Constable, charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Private Complaint Against MLA in Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Renders Proceedings Invalid. The court held that sanction for prosecution is mandatory for public servants and failure to obtain it vitiates the complaint.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M. Srinivas, a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) of Karnataka, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Mar 2012

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)