Search Results for "Letting Out"

763 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 763 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Case: Ownership Dispute in Summary Proceedings Under U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Article 227 by Reappreciating Evidence on Ownership and Bonafide Need.

The appellant, Santosh Chaturvedi, filed a petition under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Tenancy Declaration Case — Exclusive Possession Not Established. Sub-tenancy claim fails as plaintiff failed to prove exclusive possession and landlord's consent under Section 115 CPC.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the original plaintiff, Bhagyashri Asho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlord’s Appeal in Bihar Tenancy Dispute; Thika Patta Held to be Lease, Not Mortgage. Tenants of a Tenure-Holder, Being Settled Raiyats Under Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, Acquired Occupancy Rights and Could Not Be Evicted After Expiry of Head Lease.

The dispute arose from a thika patta executed by the predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff (appellant) in favor of B, covering a village for a term...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenants for Default in Rent Payment, Dismisses Landlords' Cross-Appeal on Subletting. The Court held that Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 were direct tenants of the Plaintiffs and not sub-tenants, and decreed eviction solely on ground of default in payment of rent.

The case involves cross proceedings between the landlords (Plaintiffs) and the tenants (Defendant Nos. 2 and 3) concerning a suit premises in Pune. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act — Plaintiff's Prior Possession Established Despite Temporary Absence. Possession Through Tenant is Sufficient for Summary Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute arises out of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, concerning Plot No. 8 in the layout of Uruvila Cooperative Housing ...