Search Results for "Land encroachment"

773 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 773 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Encroachment Proceedings Due to Survey Misidentification and Violation of Natural Justice. Land in Dispute Found to Be in Different Survey Number and Village, Not Government Poramboke Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

The petitioner, S. Prakash, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the proceedings of the District Collector...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Land Grabbing Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Court holds that mere revenue inspector report without verification of title deeds cannot sustain charges under Section 420 IPC and Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioner, Sri Chennakeshava, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Res Judicata Case — High Court Erred in Dismissing Second Appeal Without Considering Substantial Question of Law. The suit for declaration of title and possession was not barred by res judicata as the earlier suit did not adjudicate the rights of co-defendants.

The plaintiff-appellant, Har Narayan Tewari, filed Title Suit No.9/89 for declaration of title and possession over 0.30 acres of land (0.12 acres of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Sarpanch for Leasing Government Land to Society Where He Was President and Trustee. Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Indirect Interest in Contract Leads to Disqualification.

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Village Waghunde (Khurd), filed an application under Section 14(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.

The petitioner, M/s Drushti Engineers & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order for Unauthorized Construction by MHADA Tenant. Petitioner failed to prove that construction was within plot boundary or that MHADA lacked jurisdiction under Section 66 of MHADA Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Maniram Satyanarayan Chaudhari, was allotted a tenement by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Board (MHADA) on 19th November...