KAHC010218752018_1
20 Sep 2021...
Search Results for "Indian Companies Act 1913"
184 result(s) found
Found 184 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.
2 Jul 2019The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...
- 295
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.
20 Jul 2016The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Octroi Dispute, Directs Deposit of Reduced Amount for Continuation of Current Account Facility. The court modified the trial court's condition of depositing the entire disputed octroi amount, holding that a reduced deposit was sufficient to balance the interests of both parties.
13 Dec 2006The case involves two appeals filed by Bajaj Auto Ltd. against the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and its officers, challenging a common order...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Refund Under Section 244A(1)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Refund Arising from Appellate Order Reducing Income Below Returned Income Qualifies for Interest Irrespective of 10% Threshold. The court held that Section 244A(1)(a) applies to refunds of advance tax, TDS, and self-assessment tax, and interest is payable from the date of payment, not from the date of assessment.
9 Feb 2024The appellant, Ceat Limited, filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribuna...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Pleading Practice in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suits — Single Injunction Prayer Sufficient. The court held that separate prayers for infringement and passing off are unnecessary; a single prayer for injunction suffices regardless of the ground.
22 Mar 2021This judgment arises from an interim application in a commercial IP suit filed by Hindustan Unilever Ltd against an opposing party. The court had alre...
High Court
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Second Report from Central Food Laboratory. Right under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 frustrated by Food Inspectors' failure to preserve samples properly.
30 Nov 2005The judgment pertains to two criminal miscellaneous applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the applicants (R...
- 115
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Provident Fund Damages for Delayed Remittance. Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Imposes Strict Liability Without Requiring Mens Rea.
21 Sep 2015The petitioner, M/s HMT Limited, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, challenged the order dated 2.1.2004 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commiss...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Order Restraining Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee — Directs Bank to Pay Proceeds to Beneficiary Without Third-Party Deposit Condition. The court held that a bank guarantee is an independent contract and cannot be restrained except in cases of fraud or irretrievable injustice; directing deposit in a third-party account is impermissible.
20 Jun 2016The present appeal was filed by Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), the original plaintiff, challenging an ad-interim order passed by a learned Single Judg...
- 105
