Search Results for "Family property"

6106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Appeal Suit Challenging Partition Decree. Trial Court Ordered Partition of Suit Properties into 25 Equal Shares with 19/25 Share to Plaintiffs.

The appeal arises from the decree of the Additional District Judge, Chengalpattu, in O.S.No.243 of 2005, whereby the trial court ordered partition of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Compassionate Appointment Case Due to Delay and Inclusion of Pension in Income. Family pension can be considered in assessing indigent circumstances, and a seven-year delay in filing writ petition is fatal to the claim.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh against the judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh which had direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Extension of Justice Shetty Commission Benefits to Family Court Staff. The court held that staff of Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur are entitled to the same benefits as staff in other districts under the Family Courts Act, 1984.

The petitioners, who were staff members of the Family Courts at Aurangabad and Nagpur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court directed to be considered by the state within six months from the date of the order, granting the respondents the liberty to challenge the decision on the renewal application

Lease agreement for a property in Orissa, initially granted in 1905 and renewed in 1944 for a period of 30 years. Following the expiration of the rene...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute Over Hotel Company Exit — Holds That Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Granting Relief Beyond Scope of Reference and Without Proper Valuation.

The judgment pertains to two Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an arbitral award dated 5th April 2016. The petitioners (Panchamias Group a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Adjudicates Family Court Appeal No.13 of 2008 in Divorce Matter. Appeal Filed by Husband Challenges Dismissal of Divorce Petition Seeking Decree on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion.

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arose from the dismissal of a divorce petition by the Family Court, Aurang...