Search Results for "Expeditious hearing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Expeditious hearing"

954 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 954 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Accused's Petition for Cross-Examination in NI Act Case — Rejection of Section 145(2) Application Set Aside. The Court held that once the accused discloses specific defence in an application under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Magistrate must allow the application and grant an opportunity for cross-examination.

26 Feb 2024

The Petitioner, Narayan Shivdas Kadam, was an accused in a complaint filed by M/S Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 202 CrPC Mandatory for Accused Residing Outside Jurisdiction — Larger Bench Resolves Conflict in Favor of Mandatory Inquiry Before Issuance of Process. The provision requiring inquiry before process when accused resides outside jurisdiction is mandatory, as held by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881.

16 Jan 2024

The case involves a reference to a larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a cleavage of opinion on whether the amendment to Section 202(1) o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan. Accused's Defence of Loan Repayment and Blank Cheque Fails as Presumption Under Sections 118 and 139 of N.I. Act Stands Rebutted.

2 Feb 2023

The petitioner, B.N. Ashwath Narayan, was convicted by the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in C.C.No.28739/2001 for the offenc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Ex-Husband's Petition in Execution of Maintenance Decree for Muslim Divorced Wife. Court Emphasizes Expeditious Execution of Maintenance Decrees and Lamented Two-Decade Delay.

7 Oct 2021

The case involves a writ petition filed by Ezazur Rehman, the ex-husband, challenging an order on I.A.No.10 passed by the I Additional Principal Famil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Son Convicted of Murdering Mother Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon was complete and consistent with guilt.

24 Jan 2020

The appellant, Suryakant J. Gawde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji, sitting at Ponda, Goa, for the murder of his mother, Smt. S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in MOU and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles applicant to seek court's intervention.

6 Dec 2013

The applicant, M/s. Hira Steel Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Provide Administrative Assistance Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act for Recovery of Secured Assets. Failure to Act Expeditiously on Applications Under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Constitutes Breach of Statutory Duty, Warranting Writ of Mandamus Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

28 Jul 2011

The Saraswat Cooperative Bank Limited filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking direct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

20 Jan 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund and Directions in Income Tax Matter as Appeal Already Decided by Tribunal. Tribunal had remanded the matter to Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, rendering the petition infructuous.

16 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Manubhai Harvondas Patel, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs.8,23,999/- plus Rs.17,03,704/- along...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)