Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1598 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1598 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Sugar Factory in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Section 11-D of Central Excise Act, 1944 Applies Even When Exemption Under Section 5-A is Available. The court held that the amount collected as duty from buyers is recoverable under Section 11-D regardless of exemption, and the assessee cannot retain such amount.

8 Sep 2017

The appellant, Jalna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a first appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days of the original adjudication order, not the Tribunal's order.

25 Jun 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

22 Aug 2019

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of CL-2 Licences for Alleged Distance Violation — Held That Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Does Not Apply to Shops Existing Before 2002 Amendment and That Show Cause Notice Must Precede Cancellation.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnataka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Input Services Used in Exported Goods. Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund of credit on input services used in manufacture of exported goods, and the definition of 'input service' under Rule 2(l) includes services used in relation to export.

9 Nov 2011

The judgment involves five appeals filed by four companies (M/s. Orange City Alloys Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shridhar Castings Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Shiva Steel Indu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

8 Sep 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Inputs Used in Exempted Goods, Partially Allows Revenue's Appeals on Education Cess. Tractors are exempted goods despite education cess, but separate accounts are required under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

4 Dec 2019

The judgment concerns multiple appeals filed by M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (Assessee) and the Commissioner of Central Excise (Revenue) against a co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Interest Liability Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Interest on differential duty under Section 11AB of Central Excise Act, 1944 is payable when price variation clause exists and duty is paid after price revision.

14 Jun 2013

The case involves an appeal by Gammon India Ltd. (formerly Associated Transrail Structures Ltd.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty on Mosquito Coils Classified as Insecticides — Unjust Enrichment Defence Rejected. Product Held to Be Insecticide by CEGAT and Supreme Court; Duty Paid Under Protest and Burden Not Passed on to Consumers, Hence Refund Cannot Be Denied Under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

20 Jul 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Bombay Chemicals Limited and its Managing Director, held a Central Excise Registration for manufacturing 'Toys, Brand Mosquito C...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)