Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

307 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes University Grievance Committee Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Service Dispute. Committee Exceeded Its Powers Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 by Adjudicating Individual Employment Claims Without Statutory Authority.

14 Feb 2023

The petitioners, Chairman Dr. D.Y. Patil Education Enterprise Charitable Trust and another, challenged an order dated 30 June 2022 passed by the Griev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

17 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Deena Pramod Baldota, is the owner of land bearing CTS No.355 (part) and other sub-numbers admeasuring about 5115.2 sq. meters situate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Bank in Transfer Case — Transfer Order Restored with Alternative Posting Options. Allegations of Malafide Transfer Not Established; Bank's Administrative Exigency Upheld.

18 Mar 2020

The case involves a senior officer of Punjab and Sind Bank, Mrs Durgesh Kuwar, who was appointed as a Probationary Officer in 1998 and promoted to Chi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Wheeling Power to Own Units Is a Generating Company, Not Open Access Consumer, Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That Section 86(1)(f) Covers Disputes Between Licensees and Generating Companies, and the Appellant's Captive Power Plant Qualifies as a Generating Company.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Act Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Captive Generating Plant Using Open Access to Wheel Power to Its Own Units Is a 'Generating Company' Under Section 86(1)(f). The Court Clarifies That the Term 'Generating Company' Includes a Captive Generating Plant and That Disputes Arising from Open Access Agreements for Wheeling Power to Own Units Fall Within the Arbitral Jurisdiction of the State Commission.

4 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

6 Jun 2019

The appellant, Aarif Ali Yusuf Ali Sayyad, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Reforms in Justice Delivery System for Women's Protection — Petitioners Fail to Show Locus Standi or Specific Violation of Law. The court held that the PIL was vague and lacked specific allegations of non-implementation of laws, and the petitioners had no personal interest or public duty to enforce such reforms.

20 Nov 2018

The petitioners, Smt. Anusha N. and Smt. Anjula Vishwanath, filed a public interest litigation (PIL) before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru u...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Consumer Forum Notice Against Restaurant Company for Lack of Consumer Relationship. Petitioner Company not a 'Consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as the respondent was not a consumer of its services.

27 Dec 2013

The petitioner, M/s Vasudeva Adiga's Fast Food Pvt Ltd, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, running vegetarian restaurants in Bangal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Recognized Union Not Required for Item 6 Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. Unrecognized Union Can Maintain Complaint Under Item 6 of Schedule IV of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

6 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Maharashtra Lok Kamgar Sanghatana, an unrecognized trade union registered under the Trade Union Act, 1926, filed a writ petition under...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)