Search Results for "Departmental Dues"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Departmental Dues"

278 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 278 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Gratuity from Date of Retirement in Corruption Case Acquittal. Interest under Section 7(3A) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is payable from retirement date, not acquittal date, as gratuity becomes due on retirement regardless of pending criminal prosecution.

3 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Vinodkumar Narayan Dixit, a former Deputy Collector, retired on 1st April 1997 while a criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Terminal Benefits Withheld Due to Pending Criminal Proceedings - No Rule Authorizes Withholding of Retirement Dues. The court held that in the absence of any rule, the respondent cannot withhold terminal benefits of a retired employee solely because of pending criminal proceedings.

12 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Narayan G. Mahajan, retired as Executive Engineer from the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) on 31.02.2011. His...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Employee Against MHADA for Withholding Terminal Benefits Due to Pending Criminal Proceedings. Court Holds That Absence of Enabling Rule and No Disciplinary Proceedings During Service Render Withholding Illegal.

12 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Narayan G. Mahajan, retired as Executive Engineer from the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) on 31.02.2011. His...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Chartered Accountant for Misappropriation and Fabrication of Documents. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India's Reference under Section 21(v) read with Section 22 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 Allowed.

25 Oct 2023

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) made a reference to the Bombay High Court under Section 21(v) read with Section 22 of the Chart...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Employee's Petition and Dismisses Employer's Cross-Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employee Denied SSRP Scheme but Granted Reinstatement Without Back Wages or Lumpsum Compensation. Reinstatement with continuity of service upheld but lumpsum compensation option set aside as not a valid alternative under Section 30 of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Aug 2013

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from an order of the 7th Labour Court, Mumbai in Complaint (ULP) No.236 of 1994. The employee, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Disconnection of Sick Industrial Company. Government's Communication to MSEDCL to Disconnect Supply Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Contrary to BIFR Directions.

18 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Goradia Special Steels Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956, is a sick industrial company registered with the Boa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Restoration of SVLDRS Declaration Due to Non-Communication of Deficiency Memo. Petitioner's declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 cannot be rejected without providing an opportunity to rectify defects as per Section 127 of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019.

31 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Mpower Facility Services Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits to Exonerated Employee — Rule 55A(7) of Pension Rules, 1953 Deems Payment Due from Retirement Date, Not Exoneration Date, and Interest Is Payable Without Proving Administrative Lapse.

11 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Narayan Pundalik Pathade, a retired employee of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), filed a writ petition under Articl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Director for Company Tax Dues — Holds Revenue Failed to Prove Lack of Diligence or Recovery from Company. Petitioner not liable as director under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for taxes of Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10 because Revenue did not establish that tax could not be recovered from the company despite reasonable efforts.

12 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Prakash B. Kamat, a mechanical engineer, developed a smart card-based ticketing solution and incorporated Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of BPCL Employee Convicted Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Petitioner Dismissed from Service Following Conviction for Demanding Illegal Gratification. Court Held That Conviction for Offence Involving Moral Turpitude Justifies Dismissal Without Full-Fledged Departmental Inquiry Under Service Rules and Article 311(2)(a) of Constitution.

15 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Shri Bharat K. Vakil, was employed as a Senior Manager (Maintenance) with Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), a government under...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)