Search Results for "Delhi Rent Control Act 1958"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Delhi Rent Control Act 1958"

166 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Superannuation at 58 Years — Employee Promoted to Executive Cadre Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act. Promotion to Assistant in Executive cadre removes employee from definition of 'workman' under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, making complaint under MRTU & PULP Act not maintainable.

19 Jan 2005

The Petitioner, Shri Inthru Noronha, joined Ciba of India Limited (later Hindustan Ciba Geigy Limited) on 1 June 1965 as a typist and later became a P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Assignee Bank Can Invoke SARFAESI Act for Debt Assigned by NBFC. The case involves interpretation of 'debt' and 'secured creditor' under SARFAESI Act, 2002 and RDDBFI Act, 1993, and the effect of assignment from a non-banking financial company to a bank.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, a banking company, sought to enforce security interest under the SARFAESI Act after acquiring a debt and underlying security from a no...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Section 44C Interpretation Matter, Upholds Assessee's Claim for Full Deduction of Exclusive Expenses. Exclusive Expenditure Incurred by Head Office Solely for Indian Branches Not Governed by Section 44C Limitation, Fully Allowable Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Specific Performance Suit. Consent Decree Held Binding and Not Open to Challenge in Execution Proceedings Without Proper Pleading of Fraud.

21 Dec 2019

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different parties challenging the execution of a consent decree passed in a suit for specific perfor...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)