Search Results for "Central Motor Vehicle Rules"

280 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appropriate Government for ARAI held to be State Government – Petitioner not deemed a ‘workman’ under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Petition dismissed

The petitioner’s supervisory and managerial functions disqualified him from being classified as a ‘workman.’ The nature of duties and responsib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Classifying Motor-home Under CTH 87.02. Settlement Commission Has Jurisdiction to Interpret Tariff Classification Under Customs Act, 1962.

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.07.2008 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim in MFA No.102828/2014. Court allowed appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, enhancing compensation from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.2,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum.

The appellant, Shri Ninganagouda, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 16.09...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Circular Requiring Tourist Vehicle Permits for Contract Carriage Buses in Maharashtra. Circular dated 30.5.2009 Held Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as It Imposed Conditions Beyond Statutory Framework.

The petitioners, fifteen travel agencies operating contract carriage buses in Maharashtra, challenged a circular dated 30.5.2009 issued by the Transpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...