High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner of Vehicle Cannot Claim Compensation as Third Party Under Own Insurance Policy. The court held that the deceased, being the owner and insured of the auto rickshaw, cannot be treated as a third party for claiming compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The present appeal was filed by the United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, on 26th February 2010, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 18/2007. The claim petition was filed by the respondents (legal heirs of deceased Pralhad Nevade) seeking compensation on account of the death of Pralhad Nevade in a vehicular accident that occurred on 29.8.2006. At the relevant time, the deceased was travelling by an auto rickshaw bearing registration No. MH-23-C-1735. The said rickshaw turned turtle and the deceased was thrown out, ultimately suffering death. The auto rickshaw involved in the accident was owned by Pralhad Nevade i.e. the deceased. Respondent no.4 in the present appeal, who was respondent no.1 in the claim petition before the Tribunal, was driving the rickshaw at the relevant time. A crime for offenses under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code was registered against him for negligently driving the auto rickshaw and thereby causing the accident. The legal heirs of deceased Pralhad filed the claim petition against the driver and the appellant Insurance Company seeking compensation. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 3,50,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization, directing the Insurance Company to pay the same. The Insurance Company appealed, contending that the deceased being the owner of the vehicle, his legal heirs cannot claim compensation from the Insurance Company as the policy covers only third party risks. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the award against the Insurance Company, holding that the deceased was the owner and insured, and cannot be treated as a third party. The court directed the claimants to recover the compensation from the driver of the vehicle.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Third Party Claim - Owner as Claimant - The legal heirs of the deceased owner of the vehicle involved in the accident cannot claim compensation from the insurance company under the policy covering the vehicle, as the deceased was the owner and insured, not a third party. The court held that the insurance policy covers liability towards third parties only, and the owner cannot be treated as a third party. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 147 - Insurance Policy - Liability - The insurance policy under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 covers liability for death or bodily injury to a third party, but not to the owner of the vehicle. The court held that the deceased being the owner of the auto rickshaw, his legal heirs cannot claim compensation from the insurance company. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the legal heirs of the deceased owner of the vehicle involved in the accident are entitled to claim compensation from the insurance company under the policy covering the vehicle, when the deceased was the owner and insured himself.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, on 26th February 2010, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 18/2007, is set aside insofar as it directs the appellant Insurance Company to pay compensation. The claimants are at liberty to recover the compensation from the driver of the vehicle (respondent no.4). No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Owner of vehicle cannot claim compensation as third party under own insurance policy
  • Insurance company not liable to indemnify owner-claimant
  • Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2016 LawText (BOM) (09) 3

First Appeal No. 1285 of 2010

2016-09-23

P.R. Bora

Mr. Mohit Deshmukh h/f Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar for appellant, Mr. K.B. Jadhavar for respondent nos. 1 to 3

United India Insurance Company Ltd.

Neelabai w/o Pralhad Nevade, Ashvini d/o Pralhad Nevade, Kiran s/o Pralhad Nevade, Kailash s/o Mithu Shinde

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation for death in a vehicular accident.

Remedy Sought

The appellant Insurance Company sought to set aside the award directing it to pay compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased owner of the vehicle.

Filing Reason

The Insurance Company contended that the deceased being the owner of the vehicle, his legal heirs cannot claim compensation from the Insurance Company as the policy covers only third party risks.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, awarded compensation of Rs. 3,50,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realization, directing the Insurance Company to pay the same.

Issues

Whether the legal heirs of the deceased owner of the vehicle involved in the accident are entitled to claim compensation from the insurance company under the policy covering the vehicle, when the deceased was the owner and insured himself.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant Insurance Company argued that the deceased being the owner of the vehicle, his legal heirs cannot claim compensation from the Insurance Company as the policy covers only third party risks. The respondents (claimants) argued that they are entitled to compensation from the Insurance Company as the vehicle was insured.

Ratio Decidendi

The owner of a vehicle cannot claim compensation as a third party under his own insurance policy. The insurance policy under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 covers liability towards third parties only, and the owner is not a third party. Therefore, the legal heirs of the deceased owner cannot claim compensation from the insurance company.

Judgment Excerpts

The auto rickshaw involved in the accident was owned by Pralhad Nevade i.e. the deceased. The deceased being the owner of the vehicle, his legal heirs cannot claim compensation from the Insurance Company as the policy covers only third party risks.

Procedural History

The claim petition was filed by the legal heirs of deceased Pralhad Nevade before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Beed, seeking compensation for death in a vehicular accident. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 3,50,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum, directing the Insurance Company to pay. The Insurance Company appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 147
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 279, 337, 304-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner of Vehicle Cannot Claim Compensation as Third Party Under Own Insurance Policy. The court held that the deceased, being the owner and insured of th...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Demand of Dowry. Conviction under Section 304-B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment soon be...