Search Results for "Central Government employee"

2137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Jail Sepoy for Concealing Conviction Under Bombay Police Act — Non-Disclosure of Criminal Conviction by Disciplined Force Member Justifies Dismissal in Public Interest

The petitioner, Dnyanshwar Vithuji Ghude, was a jail sepoy (Rakshak) at Central Prison, Amravati, who joined service on 1.11.1964 and was confirmed on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging ESIC Admission Classification Based on Insurable Service Duration. Classification of insured persons into Groups I, II, III based on 5/4/3 years of service held not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Samiksha Dhole and Rasika Pohare, filed writ petitions challenging the admission notice dated 28.6.2017 issued by the Employees' Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Direction to Consider Compassionate Appointment for Son of Deceased Railway Employee. CAT Erred in Refusing to Follow Railway Board Circular on Second Marriage as Upheld by Bombay High Court.

The Union of India (Railways) filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 6 March 2014 and 26 August 2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Compassionate Appointment Due to 15-Year Delay. Unexplained delay and lack of bona fides defeat the purpose of compassionate appointment, which is to provide immediate financial relief.

The petitioner, Smt. Veena, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an endorsement dated 07.05.2022...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.

The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...