Search Results for "CESTAT order"

321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute Over All-in-One Desktop Computers. Goods Classified as Portable Under Tariff Item 8471 30 10 Based on Weight and Transportability, Affecting Duty Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal concerning the classification of Automatic Data Processing Machines, specifically All-in-One Integrated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Show-Cause Notice for Penalty Under Section 11AC Not Barred by Section 11A(2B) Despite Pre-Notice Duty Payment. CESTAT Erred in Holding That Payment of Duty Before Show-Cause Notice Precludes Issuance of Notice for Penalty.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against Tribunal Order Setting Aside Suspension of CHA License. Commissioner's Suspension Order Under Regulation 21(2) of CHALR, 2004 Upheld as Reasonable and Not Requiring Prior Show Cause Notice.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs (General), filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against an order dated 1...