Search Results for "Interest Act, 1978"

1950 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1950 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of School Management in Favor of Petitioner Trust Due to Violation of Natural Justice. The impugned order and report endorsing transfer of management were set aside as the petitioner was not heard before the decision.

The petitioner, Herle Shikshan Mandal, a trust running a school in village Herle, challenged an order dated 11th August 2014 passed by the State of Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Execution Petition — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Not Applicable to Orders Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. First Appellate Court Directed to Consider Condonation of Delay Application on Merits Before Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred.

This second appeal was filed by the decree-holder in HRC 4/78 against the rejection of his execution petition in Exn.P.162/90 and the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.288 OF 1999

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Petition by Airports Authority Against Licensee in Public Premises Act Case. Licence Expired by Efflux of Time, Occupant Becomes Unauthorised Under Section 2(g) of Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Airports Authority of India, a body corporate constituted under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenged an order dated 8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Compensation Enhancement for Acquired Land. Court holds that belated acquisition proceedings and failure to pay compensation within five years render acquisition lapsed under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its authorities against the judgment of a learned Single Judge in land a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail in NDPS Case — Commercial Quantity of Opium Determined by Total Weight, Not Morphine Content. The court held that the Special Judge erred in calculating morphine content to bring the quantity below the commercial threshold, and the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act applies.

The Union of India filed an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents (original accused) by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Pune, ...