Search Results for "Bombay High Court original side"

4996 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4996 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Refusal to Allow Additional Documents in Eviction Suit — No Error in Exercise of Discretion Under Order 13 Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioners, as plaintiffs in a suit for eviction, sued two defendants. The second defendant, during his cross-examination, applied to produce cer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation for Death of Apprentice Steward. Future Prospects and Correct Multiplier Applied Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Vincentina Paulina D'Souza, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Goa seeking compensation for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Willful Default and Subletting. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Business Expansion Upheld as Trial Court and Appellate Court Concurrent Findings Not Disturbed Under Article 227.

The petitioner, Sou. Bhamabai, wife of Ananda Raut, was defendant no.3 in a suit for eviction filed by the landlords (respondent nos.1 and 2) against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Objection Despite Dismissal of Main Appeal for Non-Removal of Office Objections. Cross Objection under Section 253(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is an independent proceeding and does not abate with dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a Cross Objection filed by Cipla Limited (the assessee) under Section 253(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in response to an Income T...