Search Results for "wrong rule"

5104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Suit — Trial Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Consider Evidence. Lower Appellate Court's Remand Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power to Prevent Failure of Justice.

The case involves a property dispute over land Survey No. 50 admeasuring 26 acres 4 gunthas situated at village Asadullabag. The original plaintiff, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging MBBS Seat Allotment Based on NEET Scores — No Right to Claim Admission Beyond Published Merit List. Petitioners, who were not in the merit list, had no vested right to challenge allotment to other candidates.

The petitioners, Kum. Pujal V. Nayak and Kum. Annabelle Melanie Gomes, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Family Court Suit — Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected. Plaint Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Adamsaheb, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 15.07.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Civil Revision Applications by Tenants in Eviction Proceeding Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenants Raised Issues of Non-Decision of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Applications, Delayed Judgment, and Misinterpretation of Section 15 of the Rent Act.

The Bombay High Court heard two Civil Revision Applications filed by tenants Vasant Mahadeo Gujar and Smt. Khatija Ismail Panhalkar against the common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Permanent Injunction Suit — Plaint Rejected as Barred by Law Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Prior Litigation Between Parties Led to Rejection of Plaint as Abuse of Process.

The present case arises from a civil revision petition filed by the defendants (petitioners) against an order of the III Additional Civil Judge, Vijay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes License Cancellation Orders in APMC Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' licenses cancelled without show cause notice or hearing, set aside for non-compliance with Section 127 of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.

The petitioners, three firms engaged in flower, fruit, and vegetable trading in Tumakuru, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...