Search Results for "contradictory statement"

1662 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1662 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Lack of Negligence Proof. Claimants Failed to Establish Rash and Negligent Driving by Truck Driver, Resulting in Setting Aside of Tribunal's Award.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 3.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Nishant Nandu Kamble, Nandu Ishwara Kamble, and Rahul Nandu Kamble, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves four criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 278 of 2016, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. Shobha Sonba Raut, was serving as Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer at Osmanabad. The complainant, Dattatraya Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Ocular Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Mangesh Sadanand Masane and Sadanand Namdev Masane (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) against their conviction an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Lahu Bhausaheb Sonwane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur, for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, and 376 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(ii) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pradeep H. Harwalkar, a Junior Passenger Assistant with Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., was convicted by the Special Court for CBI in ...