Search Results for "contract void"

1862 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1862 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Plaint Rejection Upheld for Lack of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Dispute over mortgaged properties held to be exclusively triable by DRT under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Pooja Ravikumar Nidasoshi and Vandana (plaintiffs) against the Gadhinglaj Urban Co-operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Property Dispute Based on Agreement to Sell and Possessory Rights. Court Restrains Defendant from Alienating Suit Property or Acting on Assignment Deed, Directs Plaintiff to Pay Accommodation Charges to Tenants.

The dispute pertains to a property known as 'Sharda Niwas' in Goregaon, Mumbai. The plaintiff, Jagdish Harkishan Sharma, claimed to have entered into ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Including Dealer's PDI and Free After-Sales Service Costs in Assessable Value of Vehicles — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of vehicles, challenged clause 7 of Circular No. 643/34/2002CX dated 1st July, 2002 and Circular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — Directs Deposit of Rs.12.5 Crores and Appointment of Court Receiver. Clause 6 of MOU for Refund on Default Forms Basis for Interim Relief Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, four individuals, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the respondent, a developer, on 29 July 2011 for development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Clause 10 of Agreement for Sale Dated 31-03-1957 Was a Right of Re-Conveyance, Not a Contract for Sale, and Cause of Action Arose in 1988.

The appellant, Kishorbhai Premchand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Assignment of Debt by Government Authority in CIRP. Assignment of operational debt by a government authority to a private entity is valid under the IBC, and the assignee becomes an operational creditor with voting rights in the CoC.

The appeal was filed by Ellison Oil Field Services Pvt. Ltd. against an order of the NCLT, Mumbai Bench 1 dated 21.08.2024, which dismissed an applica...