Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1831 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1831 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Set Aside for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Court Held That Arbitrator Cannot Award Interest on Interest Without Agreement and Must Decide All Claims Raised Before It.

8 Jun 2026

The present judgment arises out of a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award passed by a sole arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo-Moto Revision by Commissioner in Tenancy Matter Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. The Additional Commissioner's order setting aside Tahsildar's decision after 9 years was held to be without jurisdiction and barred by limitation under Section 32-G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

13 Jan 2011

The petitioners, who were landlords of land admeasuring 4H 27½ Guntha in Survey No. 77 at village Chinchoti, challenged the order of the Additional C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to Gross Delay and Laches. Petitioner's failure to establish tenancy and inordinate delay in challenging notifications under Land Acquisition Act bars relief.

5 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Vinayak Bhaskar Sinai Dhume, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging notifications dated 7th April 1999 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree — Court Receiver Need Not Seek Separate Leave to Sue When Appointed with Full Powers Under Order 40 Rule 1(d) CPC. Notice Under Section 106 T.P. Act Demanding Immediate Possession Is Not Invalid If Suit Filed After Notice Period.

16 Sep 2010

The plaintiff, the Court Receiver appointed by the High Court in Suit No.234 of 1987, was the receiver of the suit property 'Dev Ashish' at Peddar Roa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Landlord failed to prove bonafide requirement and unlawful subletting under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

24 Jul 2015

The petitioners, owners of a property in Thane, filed a suit for eviction of the respondents from a gala (shop) on grounds of default in rent, unlawfu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Adverse Possession and Limitation Case — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Articles 66 and 67 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court held that the suit filed by the original plaintiff was barred by limitation based on the averments in the plaint and suit notice, applying Articles 66 and 67 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

23 Mar 2005

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for possession of property. The original plaintiff claimed ownership of the suit property, while...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in License vs. Tenancy Dispute — Open Site Held Not Part of Tenanted Premises. The court restored the trial court's decree for possession, holding that the suit site was a license and not part of the tenancy under the C.P. & Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order.

13 Jul 2010

The appellant-plaintiff filed a suit for possession of a triangular open site admeasuring 60 sq.ft. against the respondents-defendants, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff's claim for possession of agricultural land failed as the suit was held to be not maintainable in civil court due to bar under Section 85 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Siddhivinayak Audyogik Vasahat Maryadit, a society, filed two second appeals against the judgment and decree passed by the District Jud...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute, Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration Due to Procedural Irregularities. Trial Court's Failure to Consider Evidence and Frame Issues Vitiated the Judgment Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

29 Jan 2026

The case involves a first appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2024 pas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff in Specific Performance Suit Against Tribal Defendant, Overturning High Court's Dismissal Based on Section 36A Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Court Held That Section 36A Imposes Restriction on Conveyance, Not Agreement to Sell, and Decree for Specific Performance Can Be Granted Subject to Obtaining Sanction, as Plaintiff Paid Rs.2,20,000 Out of Rs.2,25,000 and Performed Contractual Obligations.

15 Feb 2024

The appeal arose from a dispute over specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 31.07.2001, where the defendant, a tribal, agreed to sell land...

116 117 118 119 120

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)