Search Results for "Rent Control"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rent Control"

2120 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2120 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicated Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Award in Lease Finance Dispute. The Award Held Lessee Liable for Tax Demands Arising from Disallowance of Depreciation Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

9 Jan 2015

The matter pertains to an arbitration petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the High Court of Judicatur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant in Eviction Suit Under Bombay Rent Act; Landlord Failed to Discharge Burden of Proving Benami Alternative Accommodation. Oral Evidence Alone Insufficient to Reverse Trial Court's Factual Finding; Precedent Misapplied.

25 Jul 2005

The dispute arose from an eviction suit filed by the landlord against the tenant under the Bombay Rents, Hotel Lodging and House Rates Control Act, 19...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Excise Commissioner in Writ Petition Against Refusal of Cashew Juice Extraction Licence Amid Tenancy Dispute. Commissioner's Discretion Under Excise Act and Rules Allows Refusal When Owner Withholds No Objection and Rival Tenancy Claims Remain Unadjudicated, Not a Fit Case for Article 227 Interference.

8 Aug 2025

The dispute arose from an order dated 11.02.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Excise refusing an excise licence for extraction of juice from cashew t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Rejection of Change of Use Application for Stilt Parking Area under MRTP Act. Court rules that use of stilt area in cinema building cannot be changed without prior permission from planning authority as per sanctioned plan.

9 Jun 2005

The dispute pertained to a writ petition filed by the petitioners, who claimed tenancy rights over a 2520 sq. ft. area in the Ganga-Jamuna Cinemas bui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme for Koli Fisherfolk Community — No Locus Standi Found as Petitioners Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Interest in the Subject Land. The Court Held That the Petitioners, Being Societies Not Directly Affected by the Development, Could Not Maintain a Public Interest Litigation for Alleged Violations of CRZ Norms and Fisheries Act.

16 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Danda Koli Masemari Vyavasayik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit and Danda Koli Samaj, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay H...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Against CIC Order Directing Disclosure of Husband's Income Tax Returns Under RTI Act. Petitioner Contended That Information Is Exempt Under Section 8(1)(e) of Right to Information Act, 2005, Being Held in Fiduciary Capacity by Income Tax Department.

21 Feb 2026

This writ petition was filed by the Income Tax Officer and Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Income Tax Department's Centralised Processi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Prevent Proforma Defendants from Leading Evidence in Eviction Suit — Interest Not Adverse Does Not Bar Evidence. The court held that the right to lead evidence is not dependent on the nature of interest but on the court's discretion and the necessity for just adjudication under the Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882.

10 May 2024

The petition challenges an order of the Small Causes Court at Mumbai rejecting the plaintiffs' application to prevent certain defendants (Defendant No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.

3 Oct 2024

The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...

116 117 118 119 120

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)