Search Results for "Previous Conviction"

2016 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2016 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Balwant Malvankar, was a clerk/beat inspector with the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation. He was convicted by the Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Intention to Cause Death.

The appellant, Abhijit @ Abhay Koche, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Bhandara for offences under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Off Amicus Curiae for Non-Appearance in Criminal Appeal. Court Directs Registry to Remove Advocate from Panel for Failure to Appear Despite Adjournment.

The appellant, Jhonson Danial Disoza, a prisoner, preferred a criminal appeal through jail against his conviction. Since he did not engage an advocate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Anant Chandru Wake, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on 30/7/1994 for the murder of Mangesh Sawant, a Fores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Weak Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found contradictory and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Anna Pandurang Avaghade, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of his cousin Dilip Avaghade under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration in Bride Burning Case. Dying declaration recorded by Special Executive Magistrate found credible and sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC despite minor procedural irregularities.

The appellant, Pratap Vishvanath Dhavare, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of his wife by burning her on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if Case is Made Out Against Accused.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dadasaheb Rane, a market inspector of Bicholim Municipal Council (BMC), who was charged with theft ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Suffered from Inconsistencies and Lack of Medical Certification.

The appellant, Bapurao Siddeshwar Salave, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Borivali Division, Mumbai, for the murder of his wife Mangal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Blood-Stained Axe and Clothes, Motive, and Last Seen Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Pintu @ Arjun Suraji Suryavanshi, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Suresh Gavandi and sentenced to life imprisonme...