Search Results for "Compensation Officer"

4947 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4947 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NGT Orders Against Defence Establishments for Violation of Natural Justice. Orders passed without hearing the petitioners were set aside as they were contrary to principles of natural justice.

The Union of India and other defence establishments filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging two orders dated 23.09.2021 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal by Executive Engineer in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Upholds Additional Compensation of Rs. 94.50 per sqm. Reference Court's reliance on previous High Court judgment for same village acquisition held proper under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves a First Appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Settlement Under Own Policy Bars Further Recovery. Claimant who accepted full and final settlement from his own insurer cannot claim compensation from the opposite insurer for the same damage under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), North Goa, Panaji, dated 18.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 as Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Compensation or Challenge Proceedings After Section 4 Notification.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the State of Haryana appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisition lapsed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses CIDCO's Writ Petition Challenging Review Order in Land Acquisition Reference. Held that review application under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC was maintainable as there was an error apparent on the face of the record regarding non-consideration of earlier judgments.

The present writ petition was filed by the Administrator, Nashik, City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Rejection by Tribunal — Involvement of Vehicle and Negligence Established. Tribunal Failed to Decide Quantum of Compensation, Leading to Remand.

The appellants, the widow and minor sons of Nilesh Arlekar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation for his dea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Non-Application of Multiplier. Multiplier of 17 applied to 20% permanent disability with notional income of Rs. 4,500 per month for loss of earning capacity.

The appellant, Ramesh Manoharrao Bote, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhoom, seeking compensation for injuries sust...