Search Results for "municipal purpose"

4661 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4661 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Pune Ring Road Project — Public Purpose and Compliance with Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shankar Dabhade and others, and Raghunath Sudam Dabhade and others, challenging a notification dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Public Purpose — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as He Was Not the Owner of the Acquired Land.

The petitioner, Manoj Mohanlal Bilala, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act – Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years. Reservation of land for public purpose lapses as acquiring body failed to take steps within prescribed period under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, co-owners of ancestral land in Chehedi village within Nashik Municipal Corporation limits, filed a writ petition seeking a declaratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Agreement Not Proved. Non-recognized union cannot enforce alleged agreement; burden of proof on complainant to establish agreement and unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act.

The Thane Municipal Corporation and its officers filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Thane, dated 4 November 2011, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...