Search Results for "interlocutory"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "interlocutory"

2041 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2041 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Easementary Right of Access Case — Temporary Injunction Granted to Protect Sole Means of Ingress and Egress. Appellant's right of way over existing road threatened by respondent's construction held to be a prima facie case warranting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

11 Aug 2025

The appellant, N. Venugopal Reddy, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against an o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Recall Witness in Civil Suit — Petitioner Allowed to Recall PW1 for Cross-Examination. Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC permits recall of witness for cross-examination if sufficient cause is shown and no prejudice is caused to the other side.

25 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sri Venkappa Gowda, represented by his GPA holder, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023 — Amendment Acts Not Ultra Vires the Constitution. The court held that the amendments enhancing pecuniary jurisdiction of civil courts and the High Court are valid and do not violate Article 14 or Article 50 of the Constitution.

24 Sep 2025

The writ petition was filed by Baburao challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 (Act No.33 of 2024)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Remand Order in Cooperative Society Enquiry — Appellate Authority's Remand for Fresh Inquiry Upheld as Proper Exercise of Power Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the remand order was interlocutory and did not finally determine rights, and the writ petition was not maintainable.

11 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Telecom Engineering Staff Credit Cooperative Society, Akola, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 22.11.1996 passed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Orders Allowing Belated Challenge to Mutation Entry After 22 Years. Revision Under Section 257 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Cannot Be Filed After Such Inordinate Delay.

4 Jan 2010

The original petitioner Kailash Hublal Gupta (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 30.12.2004 pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Admissibility of Evidence in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that objections to admissibility of evidence must be decided at the stage of final arguments, not during cross-examination.

15 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Harakchand Gulabchand Dhoka, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale against the respondent, Kashinath Narsingh ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Recall Complainant for Cross-Examination in NI Act Case — Failure to Cross-Examine on Crucial Points Results in Denial of Fair Trial. The court held that the right to cross-examine is a vital part of a fair trial and cannot be denied due to the advocate's absence, setting aside the Magistrate's order rejecting recall under Section 311 CrPC.

4 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Kanhaiyalal s/o Khayaldas Kewalramani, was the original accused in S.T.C. No. 164 of 2006 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Firs...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Company Judge's Order Refusing to Set Aside Attachment of Property by Official Liquidator. Held that the Company Court has jurisdiction to decide questions relating to title and possession of property under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, and the appellants failed to establish their title.

22 Mar 2010

The appellants, Laxman Yeswant Prabhudesai, Uday Laxman Prabhudesai, and Gayatri Uday Prabhudesai, filed an appeal under Section 483 of the Companies ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Challenge to Family Court Order for Decree on Admission in Divorce Case — Order XII Rule 6 CPC Not Applicable Where Parties Allege Cruelty on Different Facts. Family Court Cannot Suo Motu Pass Decree on Admission Without Clear Admission of Same Cause of Action.

9 Apr 2010

The petitioner wife filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of cruelty. The respondent husb...

115 116 117 118 119

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)