Search Results for "negligence"

4169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim by Treating Petition Under Section 166 Instead of Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants entitled to just compensation based on actual income and future prospects, not structured formula.

The appellants, being the widow, minor children, and father of the deceased Diwakar Pawade, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Misconduct of Issuing Lesser Denomination Tickets Does Not Constitute 'Theft, Fraud or Dishonesty' Under Section 4(6)(b).

The petitioner, Vasant B. Bhujbal, was employed as a conductor with the respondent-corporation (a State Transport undertaking) from May 1968. On 29 Au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased was an unauthorized passenger in an auto-rickshaw, and the Tribunal failed to consider contributory negligence of the auto-rickshaw driver.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of the deceased, Prabha, who died in a collision between an auto-rickshaw and an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Widow in Motor Accident Death Case Due to Negligence of ST Bus Driver. Deceased's Income Reassessed and Future Prospects Applied to Compute Just Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anita Arun Memane, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving and Death Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Section 187 MV Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petitioner, Dyaniyal S/o Malku Army, was convicted by the Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Humnabad in C.C. No. 309/2019 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Criminal Application in Medical Negligence Case, Upholds Quashing of Process Against Doctor. Court directs Magistrate to obtain expert committee report before proceeding under Section 304A IPC.

The applicant, Smt. Nirmalaben w/o Narayanbhai Parmar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, aggriev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Owner of Jeep Held Liable Despite Driver's Acquittal. The court held that the standard of proof in civil proceedings is different from criminal proceedings and that the owner is vicariously liable for the driver's negligence.

The appellant, Narendra Aniruddha Dake, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries su...