Search Results for "cooperative society dispute"

1634 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1634 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Recovery of Contractual Dues from Private Company. Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Outstanding Amount Under Housekeeping Contract Cannot Be Adjudicated Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Fancy Rehabilitation Trust and its Managing Trustee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking rec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that petitioners failed to prove tenancy rights under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

The petitioners, Pradip Vasudeo Ekbote and others, filed four writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a common order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions of Retired KMF Employees Seeking Pension Revision — Petitioners Not Government Servants, Hence Not Entitled to Government Pension Orders.

The petitioners, D. Krishna Reddy and L.N. Bhaskar Rao, were retired employees of Karnataka Milk Federation (KMF), a cooperative society. They filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes EPFAT and APFC Orders Levying Damages Under Section 14B of EPF Act Due to Non-Speaking Order. APFC Mechanically Applied Maximum Damages Without Considering Employer's Written Objections, Contravening the Discretionary Nature of Para 32A.

The petitioner, a distinct establishment initially treated as part of Asia Transport Company, had been remitting EPF contributions at 10% under that b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition; Revision Under Section 76 of BT & AL Act Maintainable Despite Prior Suo Motu Revision Under Section 76A. Full Bench Decision in Shireen Sami Gadiali (2011 (3) Mh.L.J. 486) Held Inapplicable as It Involved Section 154 of MCS Act, 1960, Not BT & AL Act.

The writ petition challenged an order of the President, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissing a tenancy revision application as not maintai...