Search Results for "award after expiry"

1413 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1413 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Rejection for Non-Submission of 'Form B' Not Required by Tender Conditions. Court holds that rejection of bid was arbitrary and violative of Article 14, directing reconsideration of petitioner's bid.

The petitioner, M/s. Aditya Construction Company (J.V.), a joint venture partnership firm, challenged the rejection of its bid by the Vidarbha Irrigat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Automobile Dealers Challenging Labour Court Awards of Back Wages and Reinstatement. Retrenchment of Workmen Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various automobile dealership companies (petitioners) challenging common awards passed by the Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Chancellor's Appointment of Acting Vice-Chancellor Under Emergency Provision Despite Lack of Prescribed Qualifications. Court Examined Meaning of 'Suitable' in Section 12(7) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

This writ petition was filed before the Nagpur Bench of the High Court of Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the appointment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Coastal Zone Violation Orders Due to Alternative Remedy Under NGT Act. Petitioners failed to establish pre-1991 construction and could not bypass statutory appeal under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Prasad Naik and Rosalina de Souza against orders of the Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...