Search Results for "wrong rule"

5095 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5095 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Notary Certificate for Violation of Natural Justice. Impugned order set aside as it was passed without show-cause notice and without affording opportunity of hearing, in contravention of Notaries Act, 1952 and Notaries Rules, 1956.

The Petitioner, Mr. Lalit Doshi, a practicing Advocate since 1971 and a Notary Public since 2004 appointed by the Central Government, challenged an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Employer's Challenge to Reinstatement of Terminated Probationer. Appellate Authority Had Set Aside Termination on Grounds of Deemed Confirmation and Stigma Without Enquiry under Service Rules.

The case concerns a challenge by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nagpur, to an appellate order of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Forward Contract Prohibition; Contracts Void Under Section 3 of Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950. Pre-Constitution Bill Did Not Require President’s Sanction Under Article 304(b) as No Amendment Covered by Article Was Moved.

The dispute arose from forward contracts for the purchase of coconut oil entered into in 1952 in the former Cochin State. The respondent, a commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...