Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove title and possession; courts below correctly held that suit was barred by limitation and that revenue entries did not confer title.

The appellant, G.K. Shekharappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Trial Court Order on Impleading Parties in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Upholds Order Allowing Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers as Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, H.P. Subbareddy, filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable properties. During the pendency o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Appellant failed to prove title and possession; courts below rightly dismissed suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Shekharappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by State in Rent Recovery Suit, Holding No Privity of Contract Between State and Sub-Contractor's Landlord. State Not Liable for Rent of Premises Used by Contractor for Storing P.C.C. Slabs After Contract Termination.

The case involves an appeal by the Collector and Executive Engineer of Jayakwadi Project (appellants) against a decree passed by the 2nd Joint Civil J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Lack of Evidence on Marriage and Possession. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove the marriage of Muniyappa with Thimmakka and their joint possession, reversing the first appellate court's decree.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents/plaintiffs claiming 13/20th share in the suit property originally purchased by G.B. Muniya...