Search Results for "additional fee"

1963 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1963 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 307, 325, 324, 452 r/w 149 of IPC in a Village Faction Murder Case; Holds That Evidence of Interested Witnesses Cannot Be Mechanically Rejected and Must Be Evaluated Cautiously

The appeals arose from a judgment dated September 24, 2009, passed by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in Sessions Case No. 109 of 2003, convicting 13 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicles Act Case; Holds That Non-Furnishing of Information Does Not Lead to Summary Rejection of Permit Application. The Court Rules That Section 46 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 Is Not Mandatory and Transport Authority Can Call for Additional Information.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, setting aside the judgment of the Bombay High Court and resto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2007-2008. Failure to Assess Consideration Under Distribution Agreement Constitutes Income Escaping Assessment.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It entered into a Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging PMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium for Change of User of Land. Held that once development permission is granted and construction completed, the authority cannot unilaterally demand additional premium without statutory basis.

The petitioner, B-Right Real Estate Limited, a real estate company, owned land in Pune within the jurisdiction of the Pune Metropolitan Region Develop...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members for Non-Payment of Tax by Husband/Father-in-Law. Holds That Section 14(1)(j) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Does Not Impose Vicarious Liability for Spouse's Tax Default.

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, through Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh, allowed two writ petitions challenging the disqualification of the petitioner...