Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

2026 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2026 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Upholds 100% Loss of Earning Capacity for Amputation of Three Fingers. Schedule I of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 is Not Exhaustive; Commissioner Can Assess Functional Disability Based on Evidence.

The appeal was filed by the employer, M/s. Bharat Emery Works and its partners, challenging the award dated 19.02.2009 passed by the Labour Officer an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Court Fee Valuation in Partition Suit — Suit Properly Valued Under Section 35(2) of Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958.

The petitioners, defendant Nos. 3 and 4 in a partition suit (O.S. No. 53/2010) pending before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Udupi, filed a writ pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Port Trust for Recovery of Port Charges Due to Failure to Prove Auction Sale Date. Claim for Rs.1,14,057 Barred by Limitation as Evidence of Sale on 14th September 1981 was Inconsistent and Not Supported by Notice.

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, constituted under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1,14,057.24 with inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Quashing of FIR Against Trustees for Alleged Misappropriation of Trust Land. Absence of Dishonest Intention and Individual Ownership of Sold Property Raised to Negate Offences Under Sections 420, 406, 467, 471 IPC and Sections 66A, 67 MPT Act.

The case involved two criminal applications filed by former office-bearers of a public trust before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of an FIR a...