Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Petition Against Ministerial Orders on Land Reservation for Pune Telephones and Cooperative Housing Societies. The Court Considers Legality of Compromise Order and Subsequent Land Acquisition Proceedings in Light of Development Plan and ULC Act Provisions.

The petitioners, residents of Pune, filed a public interest petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order dated 6.2.1991 (a com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Hears Preliminary Objections in Election Petition Alleging Corrupt Practices under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Objections Pertain to Non-compliance with Sections 81, 83, and 86 Regarding Material Facts, Affidavit, and True Copy of Petition.

In this election petition before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, the petitioner challenged the election of the respondent from the Gondia c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines DDA Challenge to E-Auction Sale of Leasehold Plot for Lack of Prior Mortgage Consent. Lease Deed Clause 5(b) and Statutory Dues Claim Raise Issues of Res Judicata and Auction Purchaser Rights Under Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

The dispute concerned a leasehold plot allotted by Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to Sarita Vihar Club on 01.10.2001 for construction of a recreati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Sales Tax on Pan Masala and Gutkha in Multiple Appeals. State Legislatures Empowered to Levy Sales Tax on These Goods Despite Central Excise Levies, as They Are Not Declared Goods Under Section 14(ix) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from judgments of three High Courts concerning the taxability of pan masala and gutkha under ...