Search Results for "concurrent hearing"

2013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Cancellation of Letter of Intent for Non-Compliance. Failure to Obtain Commencement Certificate Within Validity Period Results in Forfeiture of Rights Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (I.C.&R.) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Morya Homes, a partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, was issued a Letter of Intent (LOI) by the Slum Rehabilitat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Licensing Requirement for Food Business — Holds That MMC Act and FSS Act Can Coexist Without Repugnancy. Section 394(1)(e) of MMC Act, 1888 is Not Void Under Article 254 as It Operates in a Different Field of Municipal Regulation.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar, a food business operator, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract for Sale of Agricultural Land.

The appellant/plaintiff Palanivel filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated February 22, 2008, whereby the first defendant B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement of Sale Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The plaintiff Palanivel filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated February 22, 2008, whereby the first defendant Balasubrama...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Suit Property Was Joint Family Property and Plaintiffs Were Entitled to Share.

The appellants, who were the defendants in a partition suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant's claim for injunction based on title failed as courts below concurrently held that the suit property was a public road and not part of appellant's land.

The appellant filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 18th February 20...