Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1436 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1436 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Three Accused for Murder Under Section 302 IPC, Acquits Fourth Accused Due to Lack of Evidence. Common Intention Established for Assault and Murder, but Acquittal of One Accused Maintained as No Overt Act Proved.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.352 of 2007 filed by original accused Nos.1 to 3 (Balgonda Daulata Patil, Vidyyasagar @ Chotya Balgo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape and Robbery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(D) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by A1 and A2 (out of three accused) challenging their conviction and sentence by the Sessions Judge, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Capital Gains Treatment for Land Sale by Estate Administrator — Assessee Not a Trader in Land. Surplus from sale of inherited land held as capital gain, not business income, under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involved a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, challenging the Tribunal's decision th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for 100% Disabled Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Traumatic Paraplegia Victim Awarded Enhanced Compensation with Interest. Claimant's permanent disablement due to road accident led to enhancement of compensation under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The judgment arises from two appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, in Claim Application No.164 of 2005. The claiman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out. FIR under Sections 3(1)(3) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act fails to disclose essential ingredients, hence bar under Section 18 not attracted.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused in Crime No.03 of 2020 registered with Mahur Police Station, District Nand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...