Search Results for "interest refund"

2468 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2468 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Case — Redemption Fine and Penalty Reduced for Import of Used Personal Effects. Gold chain with diamond pendant held to be 'personal effects' under Baggage Rules, 1998, entitling duty-free import.

The petitioner, a US citizen of Indian origin, arrived in Mumbai on 6th May 2007 from New York. He was wearing a gold chain with a pendant embedded wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Confiscation Order for Used Haemodialysis Machines — Import Not Prohibited Under Hazardous Waste Rules. Used Medical Equipment Not Classifiable as 'Hazardous Waste' or 'Waste' Under Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-Boundary Movement) Rules, 2016.

The petitioner, Hemant Surgical Industries Limited, is engaged in importing, manufacturing, and supplying medical equipment. Since 2008, it has import...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes BMC Recovery Order in Contract Dispute — Unilateral Recovery Without Notice Violates Natural Justice. Petitioner's dues cannot be withheld without prior notice and opportunity of hearing under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Michigan Engineers Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in infrastructure and construction services, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Tax Dispute Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 — Petitioner's Declaration Wrongly Rejected as Ineligible. Designated Committee's Notice in Form SVLDRS-3 Quashed for Non-Compliance with Scheme Provisions.

The Petitioner, Ashwini Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Despite Pending Insolvency Petition Under IBC. Mere filing of a Section 7 IBC petition does not bar appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Jasani Realty Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...