Search Results for "Section 13(2) notice"

1277 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1277 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Regular Second Appeals Involving Dispute Over Joint Family Property, Adoption, and Will. The LRs of Second Wife Challenge Decrees Dismissing Her Claim of Sole Ownership and Upholding Adoption of Shettygowda under Hindu Law.

The judgment concerns three Regular Second Appeals (RSA) filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from decrees in three o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 Due to Lack of Tangible Material. Reassessment Based on Seized Documents from Unrelated Entities Declared Invalid

The High Court of Gujarat allowed the writ petitions challenging reassessment notices under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner, an in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Bank of India's Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Despite Respondent's Claim of Non-Signatory Status, with Jurisdictional Issue Left to Arbitrator.

The judgment arises from a petition filed by Bank of India under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Independent Witnesses. DRI Officers' Failure to Comply with Mandatory Provisions of NDPS Act, 1985 Renders Seizure Doubtful.

The present appeal was filed by the Intelligence Officer of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) challenging the judgment and order of acquit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Landlord's Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings on bonafide need and hardship not interfered with under Section 115 CPC as they were not perverse.

The petitioners, original defendants/tenants, challenged the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the trial court and the first appellate court under...