Search Results for "Distinct offences"

1237 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1237 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Balu Mali, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Suman, under Sections 302, 201, and 498-A of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Absence of Instigating Acts. Land Dispute and Suicide Note Not Sufficient to Attract Section 306 IPC Without Proximate and Direct Instigation.

The applicants, Ramdas @ Rama s/o Popat Adhav, Dada s/o Popat Adhav, Popat s/o Sakharam Adhav, and Jijabai w/o Popat Adhav, filed a criminal applicati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Applications to Appoint Arbitrator in LLP and Trust Dispute Over School Management Agreements. Court Holds That Arbitration Clause in School Management Services Agreement Binds Non-Signatory Trust Due to Interconnected Agreements.

The judgment concerns two arbitration applications filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Edufocus International Edu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Compensation for COVID-19 Death at Jalgaon Civil Hospital, Finds No Negligence. Death due to COVID-19 does not automatically imply medical negligence; hospital followed standard protocols.

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Pratibha Shinde, President of Lok Sangharsh Morcha, along with two other petitioners, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Health Inspector in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anil Ramchandra Orape, a Health Inspector with the Pune Municipal Corporation, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune on 30/12/1997 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction order under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 must show application of mind and failure to do so vitiates prosecution.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent (original accused) by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sec...