Search Results for "Cooperative Court jurisdiction"

2293 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2293 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Show Cause Notices in Tenancy Case Due to 33-Year Delay and Land Conversion -- Proceedings Under Bombay Tenancy Act Barred When Land Converted to Non-Agricultural Use

The petitioners challenged show cause notices issued under Section 84C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding land transactio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Liability for Pre-Sale Property Tax Arrears After Sale of Property. Transferor Not Liable for Taxes Accruing After Transfer Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Vishal Laxman Sakhare, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Pune, which reversed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Approval as Abuse of Process. Court finds lack of bonafides and imposes costs of Rs. 5,00,000 for misuse of public interest litigation jurisdiction.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sarthi Seva Sangh and another petitioner, challenging the approval of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging APMC Election Without Inclusion of Gram-Panchayat Members in Voters' List. Election process of APMC Tumsar set aside for non-compliance with Section 11(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Sadashiv Shivaji Dhenge, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Hardoli in 2017, which falls within the territorial jurisdiction of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute Between Siblings. Court holds that amendment seeking to add alternative claim for partition and separate possession does not change the nature of the suit and is necessary for effective adjudication.

The petitioners, Barkatali Abdul Razzak Kazi, Noorjahan Gafoor Shijwalkar, and Aishabi Jabbar Thakur, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Companies Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside for Non-Prosecution of Director. Section 452 of Companies Act, 2013 requires that a director must be prosecuted for the company's default; acquittal of director without trial on merits is illegal.

The appellant, M/s. P.M. Granites Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 against the respondent, T. Manohar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...