High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Writ Appeal by Government Survey Employees. Appeal Pertains to Service Dispute Arising from Single Judge Order in WA No. 1267 of 2014 (S-RES).
30 May 2024...
Search Results for "Article 201"
1531 result(s) found
Found 1531 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash FIR Against Bookies for Offences Under Karnataka Police Act and IPC. Allegations Pertain to Unauthorized Collection of Betting Amounts and Tax Evasion Within Bangalore Turf Club Premises.
30 Apr 2024The High Court of Karnataka heard a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by twenty-six individuals or entities (th...
- 100
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Stamp Duty on Unexecuted Instrument Under the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Court examines whether payment of stamp duty without execution of an instrument constitutes a valid charge and whether writ jurisdiction can be invoked for refund beyond the statutory limitation period, focusing on the definition of ‘instrument’ under Section 2(l) and the scheme of Sections 47 and 48.
12 Dec 2025The writ petition raised the question whether the High Court’s extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution could be invoked to ...
- 42
High Court
High Court at Bombay Considers Challenge to Revised Guidelines for Grant of Offshore Exploration Licence. Petitioner Argues Notification Violates Section 35 of Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002 and Article 14.
17 Sep 2013The writ petition was filed by Rare(H) Minerals Private Limited, a company engaged in prospecting and exploration, challenging the Notification (Revis...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petitions to Quash FIR No.311 of 2012 and Complaint C.C.No.410/SW/2012 Alleging Abuse of Process and False Implication in Matrimonial Dispute. Petitioners seek quashing under Article 226, claiming original complainant lodged false complaint in retaliation to an earlier FIR filed against her family in Punjab.
14 Oct 2013The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the order dated 9th October 2...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Supersession of APMC as Previous Consultation with State Agricultural Marketing Board Not Validly Conducted. The requirement of 'previous consultation' under Section 45(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 was not satisfied as the consultation was held only with the Board's office bearers instead of the full Board.
9 Apr 2013Fifteen directors of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Amravati, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Appellate Officer's Order Under Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Act. The Judgment Text Is Truncated and Does Not Contain the Court's Final Disposition or Legal Findings.
6 Nov 2019The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, a unit of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), filed a series of eigh...
- 14
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Stop-Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Naval NOC Requirement for Building Construction. Petitioners Challenged Requirement as Ultra Vires MRTP Act After Obtaining IOD and Commencement Certificate Without Such Condition.
27 Feb 2019The petitioners, a co-operative housing society and a developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court challenging a st...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.
8 Oct 2010The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...
- 78
