Search Results for "disclosure requirement"

1284 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1284 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Upholds Award as Not Suffering from Patent Illegality or Being Against Public Policy, Refusing to Reappreciate Evidence.

The petitioner, Angel Capital & Debt Market Limited, a stock broker, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 May 2009 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Flat Under NDPS Act Due to Res Judicata and Delay. Earlier Dismissal of Writ Petitions and SLP Bar Re-agitation of Same Issues Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Smt. Gulbanu Hassanali Rupani (aged 85) and Smt. Hasina S. Hemani, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Application for Perjury Proceedings Against Wife in Family Court Appeal. False statements in pleadings alone do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 Cr.P.C. without proof of intentional falsehood and necessity for prosecution.

The applicant, Dr. Santosh Chandrashekar Shetty (husband), filed a Civil Application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute Over Supply of Spurious Bearings and Non-Delivery. Court Upholds Termination for Breach of Implied Warranty of Genuineness but Remits Damages for Non-Delivery for Reconsideration.

The judgment concerns cross arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award arisin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Proximate Link Between Demand and Death.

The appellant, Santosh Bhaskar Derle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, for offences under Sections 304B, 498A, and 323 of the I...