Search Results for "High Court rules"

16957 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16957 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal Challenging Family Court Jurisdiction in Divorce Petition Filed by Wife in Pune. Wife's Residence in Pune Confers Jurisdiction Under Section 19(iii)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as She is the Petitioner.

The appellant husband, a US citizen, married the respondent wife on 21st November 2002 in India. The marriage was registered on the same day. The part...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit Against Carrier for Short Delivery of Pharmaceutical Cargo Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. Carrier Held Liable for Missing Cartons Despite Claim of Limited Liability as Value Was Declared in Bill of Lading.

The plaintiffs, M/s. Unique Pharmaceutical Laboratories, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 11,32,583/- with interest against the defendants, M/s. Stalc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allots Special Civil Application Challenging Baroda Cricket Association Election Candidates' Eligibility. Court Grants Ad-Interim Relief Permitting Voting but Restrains Counting of Votes Pending Final Disposal of Petition.

The present matter before the Gujarat High Court concerned a challenge to the candidature of four individuals for the posts of President, Secretary, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets Applicability of Written Statement Time Limit to Counter-Claim in Commercial Suits. The Court Examined Whether the 120-Day Limit Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Applies to Plaintiffs' Reply to Counter-Claims Governed by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

This matter arose from a commercial suit for recovery of money filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants). The defendan...