Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between Arrest and Order Remained Unexplained.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Thirumoorthy, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Detention Order Due to Inordinate Delay Between Arrest and Detention. Delay of 37 Days Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Alminha, wife of the detenu Mohammed Masthan, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Drug Offender Due to Lack of Proximity Between Adverse and Ground Cases. Non-Commercial Quantity of Kanja Recovered Insufficient to Invoke Preventive Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982.

The petitioner, N.Mahalakshmi, wife of the detenu Prakash, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Snapping of Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Without Explanation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Surya, brother of the detenu Karthick, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order — Live and Proximate Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Mohankumar @ Raja, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Lack of Proximity. Recovery of 8 kg of Ganja Not Commercial Quantity Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, Adverse Case Lacks Proximity with Ground Case.

The petitioner, Kathija, wife of Mohideen, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Unexplained delay of 54 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, sister of the detenu Manikandan @ Pambu Mani, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Unexplained Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Kalavathi, sister of the detenu Iyyappan, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...