Search Results for "distribution company"

1506 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1506 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Awards in Partnership Dissolution Dispute. Court upholds award on Grant Road firm but sets aside award on Colaba firm due to lack of reasons on counterclaim.

The petitioner, Zenobia Poonawala, filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging two arbitral awards...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Transfer as Unfair Labour Practice. Transfer of Employee After 28 Years of Service to Chennai Held Malafide and Without Justification Under Items 3 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sulzer Pumps India Private Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Thane, which declared that the employer had engag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition for Lack of Party Identity. Relief sought against non-signatories to arbitration agreement held impermissible under Sukanya Holdings principle.

The case involves an Arbitration Petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Rakesh S. Kathotia and another (Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cancellation of Trademark 'PAXIL' for Non-Use Under Section 47 of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Petitioner's Global Reputation and Prior Use Established 'Person Aggrieved' Status.

The Petitioner, Glaxo Group Limited, a global pharmaceutical company, filed a petition under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 seeking cancellat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in DMICDC Project — Upholds Right of Tenderer to Withdraw Before Acceptance Under Section 5 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The Government of India envisaged the development of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMICDC), a large infrastructure project covering approximat...