Search Results for "common law rights"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "common law rights"

5402 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5402 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises for consideration when both courts below have concurrently found the plaintiff's possession and title based on evidence.

18 Dec 2025

The present regular second appeal was filed by the defendants (appellants) under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Writ Petitions in Property Dispute, Upholding Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that disputes regarding title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings and that appointment of receiver is a discretionary remedy to preserve property.

25 Apr 2023

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a piece of land in Mumbai. The original plaintiff, Amedmal Bhatewada (since deceased), filed a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Qatar Airways Against Maintainability of Summary Suit for Recovery of Rs. 59.22 Lakhs. Foreign Company Not Entitled to Sovereign Immunity Under Section 86 CPC as It Is a Commercial Entity, Not a Foreign State.

8 Jan 2013

The respondent, Shapoorji Pallonji & Co., filed a summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the appellant, Qatar Ai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cadila Pharmaceuticals in Passing Off Action by Medley Laboratories. Marks 'HB TONE' and 'RB TONE' Held Deceptively Similar for Pharmaceutical Products, Injunction Confirmed.

8 Apr 2011

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellant (original defendant) for infringement and passing o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments in Co-operative Housing Society. Court Holds That Re-Development Agreement and Bye-Law Amendments Without General Body Approval Are Void Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

9 Jun 2026

The petitioner, B. K. Corporation, an association of persons, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of a re-development agreement and bye-law...

High Court

NOTICE OF MOTION NO.955 OF 2018

2 May 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application to Appoint Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute — Insurer's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Leads to Court Intervention. The court held that the respondent's failure to appoint its arbitrator under the arbitration clause in the terrorism insurance policy entitled the applicant to seek appointment by the court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 May 2013

The applicant, Essar Steel India Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

20 Jul 2016

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Quashing Petitions by Ex-Employees in Data Theft Case; Court Reserves Judgment on Whether Confidential Information Constitutes Property Under IPC and IT Act. The case involved allegations of theft of confidential data by former employees, raising significant questions on the intersection of information technology law and traditional property concepts under criminal law.

29 Apr 2025

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard two criminal petitions filed by former employees of M/s Silicomp India Private Limited (accused Nos. 2,...

109 110 111 112 113

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)