Search Results for "Tribunal error"

4796 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4796 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Remands for Fresh Adjudication on Negligence and Compensation.

The appellant, Ashwinbhai Natvarlal Bhoi, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses EPF Board's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Damages and Interest Levy for Lack of Application of Mind. Levy of damages under Section 14B requires consideration of mens rea or willful default, and interest under Section 7Q must be computed with details.

The Central Board of Trustees, EPF, filed writ petitions challenging an order of the Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, which quashed an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Allows Cross-Objection for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Deceased, and Claimants Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 18.06.2015 at about 9.30 p.m. near Jafarwadi village, Belagavi. The deceased, one Manjunath, wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Challenge by Licensor in Arbitration Act Section 34 — Arbitral Awards Directing Refund of Security and Electricity Deposits Upheld. Interpretation of 'Vacate' Did Not Require Bare-Shell Removal and Refund Obligation Was Independent of Partition Dispute.

Background: The dispute arose out of two identical Leave and License Agreements dated April 30, 2019, executed between Paperbox Company of India (lice...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — Party Cannot Take Inconsistent Stances. Original Respondent's written commitment to a court-appointed sole arbitrator binds it, and its subsequent objection to the appointment is inequitable conduct.

The Original Respondent (Global Zone Sanitory Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.) filed a Review Petition against an order dated June 20, 2024, appointing a sol...