Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Concurrency of Sentences Under Section 427(2) CrPC for Prisoner Serving Life Imprisonment. Previous Sentence of Seven Years Directed to Run Concurrently with Life Sentence for Offence Committed Prior to First Conviction.

The petitioner, Kailas Shankar Navekar, was convicted in Sessions Case No. 100/2006 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, for offences under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Public Servant Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 29-10-2010 passed by the learned Special Judge, Kachchh @ Bhuj in Spec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenants' Revision Petitions in Eviction Cases — Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement for Demolition and Reconstruction Established. Eviction orders under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 upheld as tenants failed to prove hardship outweighs landlord's need.

The case involves three revision petitions filed by tenants (Vinod G., Dr. Narayuan Waddinnavar, and Meena Pawar) against a common order dated 04.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Applications Challenging Order to Remove Encroachments from Suit Property in Partition Suit. Court Upholds Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC to Direct Removal of Encroachments During Pendency of Suit to Preserve Subject Matter of Suit.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by the applicants (original defendants) challenging an order dated 30/04/2019 passed by the Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Constitutionality of Section 17 Prohibiting Legal Representation in Senior Citizens Act Proceedings. Petitioner, an Octogenarian, Seeks Declaration That Bar on Advocates is Ultra Vires Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1960.

The dispute arose under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The petitioner, an 82-year-old man, alleged that his son...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Employee Convicted of Theft While Under Suspension — Limitation Bar Applied for Delayed Challenge. The Court held that a removal order under Rule 19(i) of CCS (CCA) Rules is not a continuing wrong and delay of 13 years cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019

...