Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. The court held that no adjudication is required when the detention order has been revoked, and the petition becomes infructuous.

The petitioner, Snegakumari, wife of the detenu Manikandan @ Koolamani, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982 for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Mere Involvement in Criminal Cases Insufficient for Preventive Detention as Ordinary Law is Adequate.

The petitioner, Padmanaban, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detention order dated 06.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity of Kanja. Recovery of 2.5 kg Kanja Not Sufficient Ground for Preventive Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982; Ordinary Criminal Law Adequate.

The petitioner, Rita, mother of the detenu Lasar Merwin Vijay @ Merwin Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority — No Further Adjudication Required. The court held that when the detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 is revoked, the petition becomes infructuous.

The petitioner, Chithra, mother of the detenu Rohith, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition After Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. Preventive detention order revoked renders petition infructuous.

The petitioner, Amala, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court, challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Habeas Corpus Petition as Detention Order Revoked by Competent Authority. No further adjudication required as the impugned detention order was already revoked.

The petitioner, Amala, wife of the detenu Ganesan alias Jangili Ganesan, filed a Habeas Corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...