Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"

3559 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3559 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Ejectment Decrees Filed by Tenants — Considers Whether Suits by Auction Purchaser Are Barred by Limitation and Maintainable. Examines Applicability of Limitation Act and Tenancy Principles to Auction Purchaser’s Claim for Possession.

The High Court of Karnataka heard three regular first appeals (RFA Nos. 1926/2013, 1924/2013, and 1925/2013) filed by tenants against decrees of eject...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Reject Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance. Suit for specific performance of agreement for sale filed after ten years from the stipulated date of performance is barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioners, who were defendants in a suit for specific performance, challenged an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which rejected their app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Quo Warranto Petitions Challenging Appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries. Petitioners failed to establish that the appointments violated Article 164(1A) of the Constitution of India as the incumbents were not Members of the Legislative Council.

The petitioners, two Members of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...