Search Results for "understanding consequences"

1222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimants in Motor Vehicle Accident Case — Apportionment of Liability Between Owner and Insurer Upheld. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation for injuries sustained in a road accident under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves multiple miscellaneous first appeals filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and award date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Village Accountant for Misappropriation of Government Funds. Disciplinary Authority's Order Based on Proved Charges Under Rule 3(1) of Karnataka Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and Rule 8(vi) of CCA Rules, 1957 Upheld.

The petitioner, Umesh S/o Vittal Biradar, was working as a Village Accountant at Revathgaon, Taluk Indi. On 25.06.2015, the State Government passed an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Evidence. Section 304(A) IPC Proceedings Set Aside as Complaint Did Not Disclose Essential Ingredients of Rash or Negligent Act Causing Death.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshwari, a medical practitioner, sought quashing of the order dated 19.08.2013 passed by the JMFC-II, Raichur, in FIR No.669/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Expert Opinion and Prima Facie Evidence. Section 304(A) IPC Proceedings Set Aside as Complaint Did Not Disclose Essential Ingredients of Rash or Negligent Act Causing Death.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshwari, a medical practitioner, sought quashing of the order dated 19.08.2013 passed by the JMFC-II, Raichur, in FIR No.669/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Annayappa @ Krishnappa and Babu, were convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural, for the murder of Munir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Application Due to Non-Existence of Arbitration Agreement — No Prima Facie Case for Reference to Arbitration Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Unistar Metals Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking reference ...